The review workflow is designed for PDF and DOCX documents. Scanned image PDFs, encrypted files, damaged files, or unusual formatting may need additional handling.
Frequently asked questions
Clear answers about Turnitin AI checker searches, iThenticate-style comparisons, file requirements, private document handling, and the limits of pre-submission review.
Yes. tunitiny is positioned as an independent pre-submission review surface for manuscript AI score questions, similarity review, and citation checks before journal submission or peer review.
No. tunitiny is independent. References to Turnitin or iThenticate describe search intent and workflow comparison only.
No. Manuscripts reviewed through tunitiny are not submitted to, stored in, or indexed by Turnitin or iThenticate databases. tunitiny is a private pre-submission review surface, not a repository workflow.
A manuscript AI score is best treated as a review indicator, not a final verdict.
Not necessarily. Similarity and AI indicators can change when the manuscript version changes or another platform uses different thresholds.
AI-content indicator review supports English and Spanish. Similarity review language coverage can vary by source coverage and processing capability.
Report access and deletion timing are shown in the privacy policy so you can review the document-handling boundary before using the service.
No. AI-content and similarity results should be treated as review indicators.
Dense academic phrasing, repeated sentence structure, generic transitions, and heavily polished prose can sometimes resemble AI-writing patterns. Treat any signal as a revision prompt, not a verdict.
Start with passages that combine high AI-writing signals, weak attribution, concentrated source overlap, or vague paraphrasing. Then revise wording, add citation context, and check quotations.
Review timing depends on document length, queue status, and processing capacity. tunitiny surfaces timing expectations before a manuscript report is generated.
No. tunitiny is positioned around private manuscript review with visible retention, deletion, and access-control boundaries.
Similarity review means summarizing possible text overlap signals so you can inspect citations, quotations, paraphrasing, and matched-source context before journal or institutional screening.
Report access and deletion timing are described in the privacy policy before use. Manuscript files are handled for temporary processing and report delivery, while any account, billing, or support records can be retained separately from manuscript content.
Refund eligibility follows the published Refund Policy and the status of the manuscript review.
No. tunitiny is presented as an independent pre-submission review workflow and does not claim affiliation, endorsement, or official compatibility with third-party detection or submission platforms.
Use the report to review wording, sources, citation notes, and sections that may need additional editing before submission.
Support can review the issue and determine whether a retry, credit, or refund policy applies.